Joseph Kowalski <jek3 at sun.com> wrote:
> > I thought that we first need to get it in.
> >
>
> Well sure,... you can either review the newer features or disable them
> in such a delivery.
Could you please explain why star should have problems with things that have
never been done with GNU tar?
> Including the newer features in the delivery without them being
> reviewed/approved
> is not an option.
What do you like to achieve here?
If star should be in sfw, then I see absolutely no need to review the new
features.
If the code needs a review, why then do you propose to not put it into ON?
> Actually, disabling them might not be a bad idea. If I remember the
> newer features,
> not providing them would disappoint some users, but I think only a small
> number.
I am not willing to disable the new features as this does not make sense
and causes a high workload.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
