Joerg Schilling wrote:
> If star should be in sfw, then I see absolutely no need to review the new
> features.
>
sfw has different rules than ON as far a makefiles and such.
The interface review and stability rules are the same. They actually
apply to
all Sun products (which are currently the same rules adopted by
OpenSolaris).
> If the code needs a review, why then do you propose to not put it into ON?
>
I didn't make this assertion.
I *did* suggest it should be in ON. *You* didn't like the makefile
rules in ON.
>> Actually, disabling them might not be a bad idea. If I remember the
>> newer features,
>> not providing them would disappoint some users, but I think only a small
>> number.
>>
>
>
> I am not willing to disable the new features as this does not make sense
> and causes a high workload.
>
Deja Vu! Then we are at the same impass we reached before. I presented
two options:
1) Get the new features reviewed.
2) Disable/Remove them.
You get to chose 1) or 2).
You don't get to say "No".
- jek3
