Joseph Kowalski <Joseph.Kowalski at eng.sun.com> wrote:
> I just don't see this in the thread. I see a lot of debate (which I
> started) as to it the /sbin version is justified, but as I said that
> is a discussion about "more than one shell in /sbin" and not specifically
> targetted at ksh93. Thinking in terms of "*sh*" might make this seem
> less targetted and believe me, we would be having the same reaction
> for any of those possible shells.
What we _really_ should discuss is whether there is a program in / (not /usr)
that needs wordexp() as wordexp() is currently in /lib/libs but calls
/usr/bin/ksh
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
