Darren Reed wrote:
> In PSARC yesterday, Gary mentioned that he disliked the idea of having
> the names similar to those used for RBAC, lest it cause confusion.
Personally I don't think there will be confusion but it is a fair concern.
> So that is 2 votes for "solaris.inetd" (you & Darren Moffat) and 1
> against (Gary).
>
> So the only question that would remain is how should that name be
> classified and to my view, there's only one that makes sense: Project
> Private (it is an implementation detail of how the resource limit is
> being modified for inetd and not an architectural mechanism with which
> users/administrators are expected to with.)
Let me make yet another naming suggestion then....
We already have a "system" project why not:
"system.inetd"
"system.foo"
--
Darren J Moffat
