Scott Rotondo writes: > James Carlson wrote: > > Darren J Moffat writes: > >> We already have a "system" project why not: > >> "system.inetd" > >> "system.foo" > > > > I think Scott's concern about nesting is valid, but that's otherwise a > > nice idea. > > > > I have another suggestion. Seeing that /etc/project already uses > user.<name> and group.<name>, why not svc.<name>, where <name> is > derived from the service FMRI? That seems sufficient to achieve our real > purpose, which is creating unambiguous names rather than reserving a > Sun- or Solaris-controlled namespace.
Doubleplus good. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
