James Carlson wrote:
> Darren J Moffat writes:
>> We already have a "system" project why not:
>> "system.inetd"
>> "system.foo"
>
> I think Scott's concern about nesting is valid, but that's otherwise a
> nice idea.
>
I have another suggestion. Seeing that /etc/project already uses
user.<name> and group.<name>, why not svc.<name>, where <name> is
derived from the service FMRI? That seems sufficient to achieve our real
purpose, which is creating unambiguous names rather than reserving a
Sun- or Solaris-controlled namespace.
Scott
--
Scott Rotondo
Principal Engineer, Solaris Security Technologies
President, Trusted Computing Group
Phone/FAX: +1 408 850 3655 (Internal x68278)
