John Fischer wrote:
> Garrett,
>
> I'll talk to Brian Cameron about the possibility of creating
> a plugin for gstreamer that will take advantage of the new
> features integrated by this project.
That would be very cool. It would also make VDPAU much more useful on
Solaris. :-)
-- Garrett
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> John Fischer wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> This case times out tomorrow. I believe that all the
>>> issues have converged. Is anyone waiting on any issue? '
>>
>> I confess I'm still less than confident about lack of
>> integration/synchronization with our "normal" video software on
>> Solaris. I fear that this software may become a virtual "orphan" --
>> a nice API that nobody actually uses.
>>
>> That said, I don't know that this concern is significant enough to
>> warrant holding the case any further. Maybe once this is integrated
>> someone will try to figure out how to make it work with
>> totem/xine/gstreamer.
>>
>> -- Garrett
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>>> James Carlson wrote:
>>>>> John Martin writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> After some private tutoring by James Carlson, I agree the interface
>>>>>> stability should be marked as Committed and if there are changes to
>>>>>> interfaces there will be new ARC submissions and approvals before
>>>>>> these changes are delivered to Solaris.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the process for changing the three interface levels from
>>>>>> Volatile to Committed in the ARC document?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since it's a fast-track, you just did it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Okay, as long as everyone is reasonably confident that reasonable
>>>> efforts to maintain interface stability will be preserved.
>>>>
>>>> -- Garrett
>>
