>you categorization of unison as "inferior FOSS" is totally subjective >and inappropriate. unison is a wonderful tool that does exactly what >it was designed todo. i'm a huge fan of high-quality software (go read >my bug reports if you don't believe me) and i've been using unison on >a daily basis for many years now.
I was reading this discussion in the light that unison is no longer an actively maintained project in a language few of us are familiar with and that fielding support anywhere for unison would be a tad difficult. Not so much "inferior" as we as "no known means of fixing it if it happens to be broken". But it's silly to have this discussion every time so perhaps we can just drop it and continue with the case at hand. Casper
