On 03/12/10 11:16, Peter Memishian wrote: > > On a related note, the materials don't explicitly state the case > > dependencies, but I believe this case has a dependency on PSARC > > 2007/429. Pulling on that case's string, the sweater that would need to > > get backported into a patch gets quickly unraveled. ;-) > > An excellent point, and one that I'm embarrased to admit I overlooked when > considering the S10 aspects of this case. Further, this case is dependent > on a massive number of other Nevada-only projects, going all the way back > to Clearview Vanity Naming and the Devname Project. That is, I think any > practical possibility of backporting this particular solution to S10 is > dead in the water. > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > | InfiniBand Specific Link Properties | > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > | linkmode | ON Consolidation Private | > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Given that it's Consolidation Private, I take it that this is a private > > property (as defined by 2007/429). I was under the impression that > > private properties had to be prefixed by a '_' character as required by > > the Brussels framework. Is that not the case? > > I think this is just an error in the interface table; `linkmode' is > intended to be a Committed property for IB links, hence its inclusion into > the dladm manpage Sudhakar provided. > > Yes. The "linkmode" property is intended to be a committed property for IB datalinks.
regards, Sudhakar > -- > meem > > -- ---------------------------------------------- Arise Awake Stop Not till the goal is reached ---------------------------------------------- Sudhakar Dindukurti Oracle America, Inc. 17, Network Circle, Rm#3384 (650) 786 8563 (Work) Menlo Park, CA 94025
