I am satisfied. My +1 remains.
- Garrett
On 03/17/10 09:27 AM, Ted H. Kim wrote:
> Seb & Garrett,
>
> Here is the summary of changes made in the case as a result
> of the discussion -
>
> 1. clarifying the micro/patch binding
> 2. mentioning the closure of the older case
> 3. changing linkmode to committed
>
> ------- case.txt -------
> 56c56,61
> < A micro/patch binding is asserted for this proposal.
> ---
> > A micro/patch binding is asserted for this proposal. This case
> > depends on number of other networking projects which have "minor"
> > binding (PSARC 2007/429, PSARC 2006/499, PSARC 2003/246, etc.).
> > But this case does not introduce any new incompatible changes.
> > The project provides a upgrade script which will automatically
> > convert the old datalinks to the new model during upgrade.
> 57a63,67
> > There is an older open case which started discussing IPoIB dladm
> > (PSARC/2009/365). This case supersedes that one, and so the older
> > case has been closed.
> >
> >
> 335c345
> < | linkmode | ON Consolidation Private |
> ---
> > | linkmode | committed |
>
> Once I am sure that no other changes are needed, I will repost
> the updated case.
>
> So please tell me if you feel anything else needs to be addressed.
> Garrett, please be sure you still feel comfortable with what
> has happened since your "+1".
>
> Thanks,
> -ted
>
