Seb,

> One point of minor confusion for me is that you have another ongoing 
> PSARC case that overlaps this one (PSARC 2009/365).  I can guess that 
> you intended this case to supersede that one, but can you please make 
> that explicit here?  If that's indeed the case, please close 2009/365 
> appropriately.

Good point. I will say for the record
that you are correct about the intention.
This case was meant to supercede the older one.
I will clean up the old one and close/withdraw it.

To be honest, I have never had to do that before,
so if there is a specific way to resolve this which
you would want to see, please tell me.


Thanks,
-ted

Ted H. Kim, PhD
Sun/Oracle America Inc.                         ted.kim at sun.com
222 North Sepulveda Blvd., 10th Floor       (310) 341-1116
El Segundo, CA  90245                          (310) 341-1115 FAX

Reply via email to