Seb, > One point of minor confusion for me is that you have another ongoing > PSARC case that overlaps this one (PSARC 2009/365). I can guess that > you intended this case to supersede that one, but can you please make > that explicit here? If that's indeed the case, please close 2009/365 > appropriately.
Good point. I will say for the record that you are correct about the intention. This case was meant to supercede the older one. I will clean up the old one and close/withdraw it. To be honest, I have never had to do that before, so if there is a specific way to resolve this which you would want to see, please tell me. Thanks, -ted Ted H. Kim, PhD Sun/Oracle America Inc. ted.kim at sun.com 222 North Sepulveda Blvd., 10th Floor (310) 341-1116 El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 341-1115 FAX