On 12/03/2010 18:32, Don Cragun wrote:

> While it is nice (and correct) to say that ksh93 passes the VSC tests
> for sh, that is not an indication that the sed functionality built
> into ksh93 will pass the VSC tests for sed.

I am led to believe that VSC doesn't run *at all* under ksh93.

-- 
Alan Burlison
--

Reply via email to