On 12/03/2010 18:39, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I don't think there was any indication anywhere that the bits would > *not* pass POSIX conformance tests. Obviously a change of this nature > (specifically to /usr/xpg4/bin/sed) requires such conformance testing to > be done. Such testing, however, is not architectural in scope. > (Conversely, if the team were going to abandon POSIX conformance, then > that would be architectural in scope. But that is not what has been > proposed.)
I merely asked if the testing had been done, and I still don't know the answer. -- Alan Burlison --
