On 03/12/10 03:18 PM, Alan Burlison wrote:
> On 12/03/2010 18:32, Don Cragun wrote:
>
>> While it is nice (and correct) to say that ksh93 passes the VSC tests
>> for sh, that is not an indication that the sed functionality built
>> into ksh93 will pass the VSC tests for sed.
>
> I am led to believe that VSC doesn't run *at all* under ksh93.
>
(Removing PSARC. This concern, while valid, is not architectural.)
Olga, please make sure that this is properly qualified. I'm not going
to second guess you, but your integration sponsor *should* double check
this, perhaps with a request to see the VSC test results.
- Garrett
