On 06/08/10 09:57, Suhasini Peddada wrote:
Hi Garrett and Darren,
On 06/08/10 09:35 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 17:04 +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 08/06/2010 07:11, Suhasini Peddada wrote:
Hi Darren,
On 06/07/10 06:06 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
I agree with Bart I don't approve of the removal of this command.
Cleaning up SFW is fine but don't throw out useful good small
utilities that have very little (or near zero) maintenance.
-1.
Are you derailing the case?
No I'm suggesting the case be withdrawn and the removal not be done.
And if the case owners decline to withdraw?
We can suggest, but as I understand it, the only action we have
available to us formally as part of a fast track (besides +1'ing or
remaining silent) is to derail.
Really not a derail, just not approved and the project team
gets to choose how to proceed to get approval or withdraw.
The tool may be useful, but so are a great many others. Does it have
any tie-in(s) to other parts of the system?
Thanks for your input.
If the above question is related to technical tie-in(s) then I guess Lukas
can clarify.
IMO, Garrett is asking about some bigger plans. For example,
getting rid of all of SFW would be a bigger plan. Identifying
parts of SFW that are not useful and removing them would be
a bigger plan. You get the idea ....
Gary..
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-arc mailing list
[email protected]
