On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 10:38 -0700, Suhasini Peddada wrote:
> Hi Gary, Darren, Garrett, Bart and Lukas,
>
> How about setting up an offline meeting to discuss the case?
> As there is no PSARC meeting tomorrow, I guess we can use 10:00 AM pacific
> time slot.
>
> Does it work for you?
I don't need to be a part of the meeting, because I don't have a strong
opinion about this case. I was just asking questions, is all.
- Garrett
>
> Thanks,
> -Suha
>
>
> On 06/08/10 10:24 AM, Gary Winiger wrote:
> > On 06/08/10 09:57, Suhasini Peddada wrote:
> >> Hi Garrett and Darren,
> >>
> >> On 06/08/10 09:35 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 17:04 +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> >>>> On 08/06/2010 07:11, Suhasini Peddada wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Darren,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 06/07/10 06:06 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I agree with Bart I don't approve of the removal of this command.
> >>>>>> Cleaning up SFW is fine but don't throw out useful good small
> >>>>>> utilities that have very little (or near zero) maintenance.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Are you derailing the case?
> >>>> No I'm suggesting the case be withdrawn and the removal not be done.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> And if the case owners decline to withdraw?
> >>>
> >>> We can suggest, but as I understand it, the only action we have
> >>> available to us formally as part of a fast track (besides +1'ing or
> >>> remaining silent) is to derail.
> >
> > Really not a derail, just not approved and the project team
> > gets to choose how to proceed to get approval or withdraw.
> >>>
> >>> The tool may be useful, but so are a great many others. Does it have
> >>> any tie-in(s) to other parts of the system?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks for your input.
> >>
> >> If the above question is related to technical tie-in(s) then I guess
> >> Lukas
> >> can clarify.
> >
> > IMO, Garrett is asking about some bigger plans. For example,
> > getting rid of all of SFW would be a bigger plan. Identifying
> > parts of SFW that are not useful and removing them would be
> > a bigger plan. You get the idea ....
> >
> > Gary..
>
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-arc mailing list
[email protected]
