I. Szczesniak writes: > On 3/23/09, James Carlson <james.d.carl...@sun.com> wrote: > > ольга крыжановская writes: > > > Who closed this bug? This is *not* a duplicate of 6820733. 6820733 is > > > for brandz and 6820737 is for the Solaris kernel. > > > > > > I did. Fixing 6820733 implies bumping up the number of RT signals for > > all, and the only known user is a Linux application, so I don't see a > > point in having multiple RFEs outstanding. > > > > If nobody needs more than 8 RT signals on regular (non-BrandZ) Solaris > > -- and nobody has described such a need > > Then search again, please.
I'm talking about the contents of CR 6820737. There's no "search" involved. The description field of that CR just duplicates what was said in 6820733. If the original submitter wants me to, then I'll reopen and change the description so that it says something clear about the actual fix that's desired. > We were unable to port two products to > Solaris because Sun only implemented the minimum number required by > POSIX (8) that Sun marketing can add the 'certified POSIX-conformant' > sticker. > Amersham has filed RFEs to increase the number of realtime signals in > Solaris to 48 in 1998, 2003 and 2006 (as GE Healthcare after the > acquisition). CR numbers would be appreciated. I did several searches for existing CRs related to this issue (including the ones you just mentioned), but didn't find any. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carl...@sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
