Richard M. Stallman wrote:

>*BSD and Linux don't belong in the same list, because *BSD are
>operating systems. Linux, however, is just a kernel. If you're
>thinking of the operating system in which Linux is used, then what
>you've said is an understatement. That system is not just cooperating
>with our work, it basically *is* our work. It is a variant of the GNU
>system. See http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html for more
>explanation.

St. Ignutcious was pissed b/c, he is absolutely correct, the entire Linux 
thing, especially in the early days, is strictly a GNU system with a Linux 
kernel.  Personally, I think it is very gracious of RMS to even allow Linux to 
be called GNU/Linux--though still very few people are doing that.

One of the things I don't like about the way this forum is set up is that you 
can't edit what you posted.  Running the risk of antagonizing Sun's engineers 
(again), I want to remind them a very important fact regarding today's Linux.

To most end-users, you can replace the kernel (the only thing Linux) from a 
Linux system with, say, FreeBSD, and no one would notice any difference (it may 
actually run a little bit smoother.  Of course this is an oversimplification, 
but basically with a well-configured FreeBSD system, most end-users won't 
notice the difference.)  Ditto for many other components.  However, there is 
one component that, if you take it away, the entire Linux "movement", 
especially in the desktop area, will be set back a good many years (even 
stopped).  This component is OpenOffice.org.  The last time I heard, Sun has 
been shouldering more than 90% of the development burdens.

Microsoft generates more profits from Microsoft Office than from everything 
else combined.  OpenOffice.org has matured to such a state that its "status" in 
the so-called open source world is indeed tantamount to how Microsoft Office 
stands in the Microsoft world.  Novell (SUSE) tried to do away with 
OpenOffice.org, but in the 08/18/05 release of OpenSUSE 10.0 beta 2, it was 
quietly put back.

Thinking along the line of St. Ignutcious' (that Linux should be called 
GNU/Linux), perhaps Sun's people should insist that Linux be called Linux/SUN.  
Of course, this is just joking, no one should even blink about that.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to