On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:48:53PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Requiring the license to be written in a way that it favors those who > > > break > > > the license and in a way that discriminates those who write the software > > > looks more than strange. > > > > Bah, you are making moral judgements depending on your own smallish vision > > of > > the thing, but are you sure it covers all cases ? > > I am sorry but it seems that you did not understand the problem at all.
Well, you could use wording which are quite agressive, as was already the case in the GPL vs bSD discussion or in the Linux vs OpenSolaris post. I think you are too deeply emotionally involved to put enough distance with this problem and analyse it with a clear head. The kind of language you use clearly show that, and you are thus not best placed to make judgement. Please calm down, remove yourself from your own interest, and analyse the situation with a clear head, and we will be able to make progress on this. > Try to put yourself into the situation where you are going to publish > OSS and you may understand... I did publish free/open/whatever software in the past, and i didn't feel the need to agitate the legal stick to make people comply or whatever. Also, i find it a bit strange that the OpenSolaris licencing is geared toward the needs of a lone individual. Friendly, Sven Luther _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
