On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 05:20:26PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > So, i guess it is up to interpretation of "accompanies the executable", but > > having it on the same DVD certainly can be interpreted as "accompanies the > > executable". > > And that's exactly what I meant when I said the GPL is vague on this > point. It's not at all clear what "accompanies the executable" means and > what would satisify the requirement and what would not. Nor does this > seem to be covered anywhere in the GPL FAQ.
Nothing that common sense cannot solve, unless you want to play word tricks to circumvent this problem. I am sure the judge will find out easily enough what your intentions where, and judge acrodyingly. It comes all down to you being honest with yourself when you interpret this :) > I find it interesting that all three BSD's have been distributing gcc > for years, even though their libc's still have code with advertising > clauses in their licenses. Apparently noone at the FSF has noticed. ;-) Hehe, ... Friendly, Sven Luther _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
