Joerg,

I have X.org 6.8.2 libraries, binaries, and header
packages built for Solaris 8/9/10 (x86/SPARC) over at
Blastwave. Could these work for you?!?

I have Schillix 0.2 so do I need to know something to
port X.org over to Schillix that you know of or is
everything just a ./configure & smake ?!? ;oP

I can get this done tonite or tomorrow if I know the
details. Maybe get GNOME 2.12.1 on it as well (maybe
during Halloween timeframe).

~Ken Mays

 

--- Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Jake Maciejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I don't understand why X is a priority. You
> provide fluxbox as a window manager instead of a
> full desktop like GNOME, KDE, or XFCE. You don't
> provide GUI web browsers like Firefox and Konqueror,
> email apps like Thunderbird and Evolution, or any of
> the other software that's included in (or
> pre-packaged for) a typical Linux or BSD distro.
> Other than running those programs over X from a
> different machine, I fail to see what users are
> supposed to do with your X packages. If users are
> skilled enough to build the applications they want
> from source, they ought to be able to build Xorg
> too. By the time you release 0.3, GNUSolaris will be
> providing a complete desktop with GNOME, Firefox,
> GAIM, Evolution, etc.
> 
> Let us face reality...
> 
> Belenix has been developped by starting with
> SchilliX
> and modifying it.
> 
> GNUSolaris is currently no more than an annunced
> distro.
> 
> www.gnusolaris.org is unreachable and the
> announcement
> was not clear enough to understand what GNUSolaris
> will be.
> Once we know more about GNUSolaris, we will be able
> to judge based
> on it's real features.
> 
> I would asume that they take the Solaris kernel and
> use the
> same Debian userland than Debian uses for
> Debian/Linux.
> If this is true, then it is still uncler whether
> they use
> glibc or the standard libc.
> 
> If they use the Debian userland, GNUSolaris will
> most likely not
> what Solaris users expect and GNUSolaris will not
> pass an OpenSolaris
> compliance test
> 
> If they use the Solaris userland, and only add other
> free software,
> GNUSolaris will be nothing different than SchilliX
> except that is less
> probable that it will pass an OpenSolaris compliance
> test and key 
> features from Solaris (e.g. zones) will probably
> never work.
> 
> With these constraints, it is obvious that there is
> a need to create an own X
> package for SchilliX in the near future.
> 
> Jörg
> 
> -- 
>  EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg
> Schilling D-13353 Berlin
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED]              (uni)  
>        [EMAIL PROTECTED]      (work) Blog:
> http://schily.blogspot.com/
>  URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/
> ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> 



                
__________________________________ 
Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to