Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And there is also the (IMO important issue) that opening "dmake" under a
> "free" license may help other OSes (such as "FreeBSD", "NetBSD",
> "DragonFly" etc.) to adopt it als default "make" version. "gmake"
I am pretty sure they are not interested because they need their different
make in order to compile their sources.
> doesn't have many fans (and lacks "distributed" and "grid" build modes)
> outside Linux (at least in the *BSD variants listed above) and spreading
> the Workshop/Forte/Studio "dmake" may help lowering the porting efforts
> when porting software from those operating systems to Solaris.
The current problem is that dmake id not very portable.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
