Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I have to ask. What exactly (beyond, tenuously, the CDDL reference)
> does this have to do Solaris, OpenSolaris, or any other legitimate
> purpose of this alias?
Richard, in case you did not notice:
I am not the one who did start this thread and I only did like to make sure that
it would be wrong to overestimate Debian.
I also tried to inform people on the fact that there is still a lot of FUD
against the CDDL and OpenSolaris.
I would like to see some help with trying to correct wrong statements on
OpenSolaris and the CDDL from other people. If I am the only person to do this,
the people who spread FUD have an easy living while spreading the clain that
the CDDL is not accepted in the community.
Nexenta is not the OpenSolaris distribution I am personally interested in
but I am fighting _with_ Erast when people try to claim that Nexenta is not
"free" and I try to inform people about the drawbacks of using a packet system
based on Debian when I know about problems that are caused about unneded
modifications on my software.
It seems that Erast did give up with trying to convince the people who spread
FUD on the CDDL, but I will not give up.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
