On Sunday 06 August 2006 06:23 am, Joerg Schilling wrote: > I also tried to inform people on the fact that there is still a lot of FUD > against the CDDL and OpenSolaris. > > I would like to see some help with trying to correct wrong statements on > OpenSolaris and the CDDL from other people. If I am the only person to do > this, the people who spread FUD have an easy living while spreading the > clain that the CDDL is not accepted in the community.
Joerg, Help me out here. What exactly is being done in regards to CDDL. Are packages being placed in non-free because of it? If this is the case, this should be fixed. > It seems that Erast did give up with trying to convince the people who > spread FUD on the CDDL, but I will not give up. I would add my voice to the effort also. If Debian does in fact consider CDDL to be non-free, what would they base that on? Please don't tell me that because it's non-GPL it's not free by them... -- Alan DuBoff - Sun Microsystems Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
