Ienup Sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re the file name length, having a big enough one will obviously
> help as long as there is a clear way to keep the backward compatibility
> and also with minimal breakage. Sticking to the current user land
> length definitions is also another way, i.e., no change regarding
> the length for the existing (traditional) file systems.
So does this mean that we may expect a change in
usr/src/uts/common/fs/{dnlc.c lookup.c pathname.c} soon?
What's about NFS? Is there a problem with extending MAXNAMELEN?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
