On Tuesday 30 January 2007 04:56 pm, Stephen Harpster wrote: > But what are the downsides? What does the community, you, think of the way > GPLv3 is taking shape?
Well, it looks ok, but it can and does continue to change. As long as Sun can license the code to be the most compatible with other open source software, I could really care less what type of license you put on it. If we have issues with GPL, or Debian, or GNU, or FSF, or similar, I don't see that as being healthy for us in any way. If GPLv3 would get OpenSolaris closer to being accepted, there could be some merit with it. I think it's clear that the CDDL raised several issues for OpenSolaris. -- Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group Advocate of insourcing at Sun - hire people that care about our company! _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
