> > >I think what's most frustrating about the > closed_bins is that we don't > >know *why* in some cases. I t would be helpful if > there were a status > >list for the closed_bins that indicated what items > would never be > >available (due to 3rd party or something generic > like that as reason), > >which have a chance of being available at some > unknown date (under review), > >and which items will be available at some unknown > date (in process). > > We may make a list which says "pending review" (so > that an e1000g release > does not surprise those working on cloning it) but in > many cases we > can't even tell why we can't open the source. > > Lawyers are funny that way. > > Casper > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > [email protected] >
Sigh. I figured as much. At least indicating whether the item was pending review or had been reviewed would be far more than we have now. I think most people would be ok with assuming that if something isn't "pending review" it's fair game for re-implementation. Really, I do understand. *walks off and grumbles about the horribly complex legal world we live in...* -Shawn This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
