Correct.
Alan Burlison wrote:
Phillip (Flip) Russell wrote:
What is wrong about the open source freedom to fork?
Can't someone just as easily fork under the CDDL?
I think it's the "Can't take back changes" bit that is problematic,
not the "Fork" bit. If I'm understanding correctly, if a bug was
fixed in a GPLv3-only fork it would appear that fix could *not* be
taken back into the original dual-licensed source tree.
Of course, INAL ;-)
--
Stephen Harpster
Director, Open Source Software
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]