Correct.

Alan Burlison wrote:
Phillip (Flip) Russell wrote:

What is wrong about the open source freedom to fork?

Can't someone just as easily fork under the CDDL?

I think it's the "Can't take back changes" bit that is problematic, not the "Fork" bit. If I'm understanding correctly, if a bug was fixed in a GPLv3-only fork it would appear that fix could *not* be taken back into the original dual-licensed source tree.

Of course, INAL ;-)


--
Stephen Harpster
Director, Open Source Software
Sun Microsystems, Inc.

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to