Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 08:34 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >But isn't (a) cdrecord GPL fork, (b) Debian nonacceptance of CDDL
> > >projects and (c) FSF/GNU anti-CDDL statements not considered as a CDDL
> > >failure proofs?
> >
> > No; it only proves that if we dual license that Debian (you?) will
> > fork a GNU only version.
>
> whatever it proves, it wasn't a good experience...
> And if I'm not mistaken Joerg refused to dual-license cdrecord.
For good reason... There is no license problem with cdrtools and
there is no problem that could be solved with dual licensing.
Even in case I did go back to GPL only, the real problem (some non-cooperative
people in Debian) could not be solved.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
