On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > So the /usr/gnu proposal[1] was approved by PSARC. Obviously, the > reason for defining /usr/gnu wasn't theoretical -- it allows moving > GNU packages from /usr/sfw to /usr or /usr/gnu and it helps us
I'm nor sure I see the point of exchanging /usr/foo for /usr/bar. I mean what problem will /usr/gnu solve that /usr/sfw doesn't? And doesn't that name preclude open source software that doesn't use a GNU license? I guess what I'm asking is: what is the rationale for /usr/gnu? -- Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member President, Rite Online Inc. Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
