On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 11:52 -0500, James Carlson wrote: > > > I doubt it. These sound like the most trivial of fast-tracks to > > > me. Most are probably closed-approved-automatic. > > > > You mean if the fast-track only deals with the name space and not > > with the technology itself? > > No. That's not really the point. > > When you have a project that does something obvious enough that no > discussion about it is really warranted and all the issues have > already been reviewed by some other project, then it may fall under > "automatic approval" guidelines. See: > > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/handbook/ > > This covers the case where we already have "N" of something, and "N+1" > comes along. Provided that "N+1" follows all the norms for such > things (it isn't deliberately doing something 'unusual'), it can be > self-reviewed.
Hmm... I don't think I can word the initial ARC case in such a way that adding a new binary to /usr/bin or a library to /usr/lib does not count as o "introduc(ing) new interfaces visible outside their own project" Laca _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
