"S h i v " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/10/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Unless the putting the code into gpl tree is something we *badly want*,
> > > if there is ambiguity and scope for legal battle, err on the side that
> > > avoids litigation. No point in getting into litigations that distracts
> > > & frustrates everyone.
> > >
> > > While contributing CDDL code to GPL code might not be a problem, that
> > > part of the contributed CDDL code would need to be re-licensed or
> > > dual-licensed under GPL compatible code.
> >
> > ZFS is a separate "work", you do not need to relicense it under the GPL and
> > you
> > cannot.
> >
>
> *I* cannot, because I am not the owner of the copyright. Point was
> about mixing CDDL & GPL and why it *is a problem*
> Sane thing is to follow legal advice by the qualified. It seems to
Please do!
Until now, no lawyer did tell us that there may be a problem.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
