I specifically am referring to how certain unknown elements within Sun made a decision, and whether that decision was correct or not, it was imposed on the community with little or no consultation. Not having a vote on the issue and refusing to acknowledge those who feel strongly that it was a bad decision ( correctly or not... once again, I'm not talking about the merits of the decision itself ).
This is how I define "betrayal" On 11/1/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 01/11/2007, John Sonnenschein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm relatively sure I did name him, it's Murdock that betrayed the > > community with that announcement the other day so I'm going to place > > the blame at his feet. > > Please define what you see as betrayal here, specifically, just so we're > clear. > > Not everyone's definition is the same. For example, what was done does > not, yet, meet my definition of betrayal. > > -- > Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst > http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ > > "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all > junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics > are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall > -- PGP Public Key 0x437AF1A1 Available on hkp://pgp.mit.edu _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
