On 02/11/2007, Brandorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/2/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 02/11/2007, Brandorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The team responsible (Ian and Sara) for this divisive action have
> > > actually been ridiculing those who don't subscribe to their world
> > > view. This cavalier attitude is doing nothing put inflaming this
> > > issue.
> >
> > I don't believe that to be true. Please show me precise references to
> > where they have met any definition of "ridicule" in their
> > communication to anyone in this community. I suggest you choose more
> > accurate and less inflammatory descriptions of actions taken.
>
> Ridicule - This is a rhetorical tactic which mocks an opponent's
> argument, attempting to inspire an emotional reaction (making it a
> type of appeal to emotion) in the audience and to highlight the
> counter-intuitive aspects of that argument, making it appear foolish
> and contrary to common sense. This is typically done by demonstrating
> the argument's logic in an extremely absurd way or by presenting the
> argument in an overly simplified way, and often involves an appeal to
> consequences.

I think most folks are aware of the possible dictionary / encyclopedia
definitions.

Specifically, you have not provided examples of *how* you are being
"mocked". Ridicule is also a very subjective thing; one person
considers something ridicule which another does not.

I would also caution you against saying they've mocked the those that
don't agree with them because not everyone that doesn't agree with
them feels that way, thus you are misrepresenting a group of people in
the same way you accuse Project Indiana of doing.

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all
junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics
are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to