perhaps it doesn't express how strongly I agree with you but +1 On 2-Nov-07, at 7:46 AM, Brandorr wrote:
> We all need to put our differences on naming aside to focus our energy > on trying to give Sun an opportunity to address and acknowledge the > community's disapproval. > > For me this is the biggest concern. Whether we are for or against > anyone's naming proposal, the perception among the OGB and the members > is that Sun chose a less than desirable method of making it's wishes > reality. > > If we are to hope to have Sun treat as a community we need to support > the OGB's efforts, in finding an amicable resolution to this immediate > firestorm, so that we can reengage Sun in finding a solution that the > community as a whole can find acceptable. > > There have been some drastic options put on the table, as the OGB does > not have much recourse, unless Sun steps up to the plate. > > The team responsible (Ian and Sara) for this divisive action have > actually been ridiculing those who don't subscribe to their world > view. This cavalier attitude is doing nothing put inflaming this > issue. > > At this point, I feel the Project Indiana leadership group is out of > control, and out of touch with the community. The OGB needs to address > this with the highest levels of Sun leadership. > > Cheers, > Brian > > -- > - Brian Gupta > > http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/ > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > [email protected] _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
