We all need to put our differences on naming aside to focus our energy
on trying to give Sun an opportunity to address and acknowledge the
community's disapproval.

For me this is the biggest concern. Whether we are for or against
anyone's naming proposal, the perception among the OGB and the members
is that Sun chose a less than desirable method of making it's wishes
reality.

If we are to hope to have Sun treat as a community we need to support
the OGB's efforts, in finding an amicable resolution to this immediate
firestorm, so that we can reengage Sun in finding a solution that the
community as a whole can find acceptable.

There have been some drastic options put on the table, as the OGB does
not have much recourse, unless Sun steps up to the plate.

The team responsible (Ian and Sara) for this divisive action have
actually been ridiculing those who don't subscribe to their world
view. This cavalier attitude is doing nothing put inflaming this
issue.

At this point, I feel the Project Indiana leadership group is out of
control, and out of touch with the community. The OGB needs to address
this with the highest levels of Sun leadership.

Cheers,
Brian

-- 
- Brian Gupta

http://opensolaris.org/os/project/nycosug/
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to