Fredrich Maney wrote: > I think you meant "single user machines", not "single machine users". > Those are two very different scenarios. I can see not using ACLs in > single user machines, of which I suspect there are far fewer than you > think, but in a multi-user single machine, I certainly see ACLs being > used quite extensively. > > Also, one thing to mention, GNU chmod and ls won't have any problems > with UFS ACLs, only ZFS ACLs.
Semantics, but yes, basically. But as for OpenSolaris 2008.x, I suspect there are far more "single user machines" as you put it then multi-user machines. -- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
