I agree with one caveat: the native fully supported and integrated Sun
tools should be come first the default PATHs when shipped and
modifying that value should be left up to the user. As for a setting
somewhere, why not simply put it in /etc/default somewhere along with
things like TIMEZONE, LANG and such? Logically that strikes me as the
best place.

fpsm

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Octave Orgeron <[email protected]> wrote:
> As always.. the GNU vs non-GNU tool set brings up a heated debate. The big 
> issue I see here is that the GNU tools may be prevalent, but they obviously 
> don't cover all use cases and can be broken on certain platforms. We have to 
> remember that things like ACL's, special file systems, etc. are not just 
> relegated to Sun. There are other flavors out there that have such features. 
> To have a unified tool set would require the GNU apps to fully support the 
> POSIX and platform specific bits. That would be nice, but I seriously doubt 
> it'll happen. As such having the *standard* Solaris tools is critical for not 
> just developers or SA's.. but also for commercial applications and tools 
> (think about monitoring software alone). I do like the idea of having the GNU 
> bits located in /usr/gnu, as it follows the other conventions /usr/xpg4, 
> /usr/xpg6, /usr/ucb, etc. The strength here is that our platform can support 
> multiple behaviors. It's just a matter of users setting the
>  correct $PATH statements. Is there a tool in Gnome and the CLI for ppl to 
> select the behavior they want? That would be ideal.
>
>  *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
> Octave J. Orgeron
> Solaris Virtualization Architect and Consultant
> Web: http://unixconsole.blogspot.com
> E-Mail: [email protected]
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> To: solarg <[email protected]>
> Cc: Open Solaris <[email protected]>; 
> [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:51:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] why gnu chmod in os2008.11?
>
>> i'm surprised that gnu chmod is installed, what are the advantages
>> comparing to solaris chmod?
>> It's very annoying when using ACLs.
>
> The default environment at the moment is to prefer the GNU tools as
> that is the more familiar environment for most developers and
> end-users; over time, the plan is to provide a unified set of tools,
> where possible, that is both familiar and fully supports OpenSolaris
> specific features.
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to