On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 13:32 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote: > On 02/ 5/10 01:25 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 11:54 -0600, Shawn Walker wrote: > >> However, as you are aware, GNOME release schedules slip too sometimes :) > > > > Huh?? I'm having a hard time remembering the last time Gnome slipped > > release schedule. Quit spreading untruths, else please document your > > assertions. > > I can find at least one pretty quickly: > > http://developer.gnome.org/news/summary/2004_February8_February14.html#2
And note that you had to turn the way back machine back 6 years to do it. Hence my hard time remembering. > Note I said *sometimes*, I didn't say how recent or how often. > > Also note that GNOME didn't even being to adopt a time-based schedule > until 2002: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2002-June/msg00041.html > Eight years ago. Seems to have been working pretty well since then. > Nevertheless, as I mentioned elsewhere, it is not reasonable to expect a > product produced by a commercial entity to have a strictly time-based > release schedule. There are other considerations to take into account. Agreed. But they are not necessarily more or all important considerations. -- Ken Gunderson <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
