On 31.03.2010 10:06, Orvar Korvar wrote: > If you value your data, you should reconsider. But if your data is not > important, then skip ZFS. > > File system data corruption test by researcher: > http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=169 > > ZFS data corruption test by researchers: > http://www.cs.wisc.edu/wind/Publications/zfs-corruption-fast10.pdf
These papers assume that no raidcontrollers perform regular patrol reads (what zfs calls scrubs). And that no raidcontrollers use an on-disk storage-format that sacrifices a little space to gain "per strip" (what linux-folks call "chunk") ecc. //Svein -- --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | [email protected] \ / |Solberg Østli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | [email protected] / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | [email protected] ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | [email protected] Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |[email protected] | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE --------+-------------------+------------------------------- If you really are in a hurry, mail me at [email protected] This mailbox goes directly to my cellphone and is checked even when I'm not in front of my computer. ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ ------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
