You (Svein Skogen) wrote:
> On 31.03.2010 10:06, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> > If you value your data, you should reconsider. But if your data is not
> > important, then skip ZFS.
> >
> > File system data corruption test by researcher:
> > http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=169
> >
> > ZFS data corruption test by researchers:
> > http://www.cs.wisc.edu/wind/Publications/zfs-corruption-fast10.pdf
>
> These papers assume that no raidcontrollers perform regular patrol reads
> (what zfs calls scrubs). And that no raidcontrollers use an on-disk
> storage-format that sacrifices a little space to gain "per strip" (what
> linux-folks call "chunk") ecc.
>
> //Svein
And the CERN study PROOFED, that there are
a.) RAID controllers that have faulty FWs:
b.) Bit errors happening in more than obvious places and times
Check:
http://storagemojo.com/2007/09/19/cerns-data-corruption-research/
Matthias
--
Matthias Pfützner | Tel.: +49 700 PFUETZNER | Klaus Kinkel war in China
Lichtenbergstr.73 | mailto:[email protected] | und wollte die Menschen-
D-64289 Darmstadt | AIM: pfuetz, ICQ: 300967487 | rechte sprechen, aber die
Germany | http://www.pfuetzner.de/matthias/ | waren nicht da.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
