> Not only is this statement incorrect (lawsuit is not > about GPL) ..
While the term GPL appears nowhere in the complaint, believe me (of course you don't have to), this is EXACTLY what the lawsuit is about. And I also believe that this is one of the main reasons that David Boies is taking this case. (Note that Mr. Boies does not have a California license, thus he is applying for a temporary, case-by-case, license --"Pro Hac Vice Pending", which will entitle him to represent Oracle in California courts, similar to what he was doing with respect to the Proposition 8 law suit.) As Simon mentioned in his post, had Google used the GPLv2 license, none of Oracle's claims would have merit. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
