Octave Orgeron <unixcons...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Exactly what my discussion was like. They thought it was clear enough in the 
> license because of the "production use" clause. So hopefully, they'll update 
> the 
> OTN license and make it clear that it's free for personal or hobbyist use. 
> And 
> realistically, having the source code is nice and all, but how many people 
> really compile ON anyways? Most folks just want something they can download, 

I am sure there are more people who compile ON now than before Oracle stopped 
updating the source.

Because I recently made OpenSolaris self hosting, I did compile it even more 
frequent recently than I did in 2005 while creating the first SchilliX.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       j...@cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to