Chris, Yes, the Xserver 1.9.2 package implementation is part of the basic requirements as well as Mesa 7.10 and the updated Xorg Intel 2.14.x driver.
You'll need a package set as I proposed for IPS updates: xf86-video-intel 2.14.0 Mesa 7.10 libdrm-2.4.23 cairo-1.10.2 libva-1.0.7 xserver-1.9.3 Note: ON (snv) kernel patches needed for kernel-side Intel DRI/DRM support for the Intel GMA HD 2000/3000 IGPs. Otherwise, you'll continue to have have 2D/3D performance regressions and other oddities. You can get Alan's Xserver 1.9.2 build for testing at: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/x/downloads/Xorg-1.9/build-2010-11-18/Xorg-1.9.2-20101118-i386.tar.bz2 I'm reviewing the intel 2.13.903/2.14.x 2D driver/Xserver 1.9.2 package integration for testing. Mesa 7.10 is proposed for release tomorrow. Tests ran on: Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale & Clarkdale) IGPs. ~ Ken Mays P.S. When it rans, it pours. --- On Wed, 1/5/11, Chris Ridd <chrisr...@mac.com> wrote: > From: Chris Ridd <chrisr...@mac.com> > Subject: [osol-discuss] SandyBridge support > To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > Date: Wednesday, January 5, 2011, 4:17 PM > Does Solaris have any enhancements > (in public commits?) to support the new Intel "SandyBridge" > chips? > > AIUI some X support for SandyBridge was due in Solaris > "later this year" (2010), so possibly is in S11 Express. > > But what about support for other SandyBridge features? > (UEFI, vector processing extensions?) > > Cheers, > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-discuss mailing list > opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
