On 18/10/2007, Nigel Smith <nwsmith at wilusa.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: > Yes, well spotted. I just copied the command from jabrewer's post and did > not notice the typo! > > I guess the 'scanpci' from Xorg, was originally just to identify the graphics > card, > but usefully, it detects all the other devices as well! > > You could use 'prtconf -pv', but scanpci displays the most useful > information in a more concise fashion, in my opinion. > > Maybe someone should port the 'lspci' command that we use in the > Linux world. Until then we can only work with the commands > that Sun provide. Maybe someone should file a RFE on this. > Maybe the 'Indiana' people should consider this for any > Linux converts they are hoping to attract!
I don't see the point in porting lspci; scanpci and prtconf perform equivalent functionality. This is one case where lspci provides no benefit that I am aware of other than someone typing "lspci" and expecting a result. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst binarycrusader at gmail.com - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. " --Donald Knuth
