Keith,

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:

> Your questions are best directed to the virtual consoles project
> team[0].

Will do.  I just wanted to make sure it wasn't strictly a newbie related 
problem, so I asked here first.

> Generally speaking, backwards BFU is not supported, so it would not be 
> surprising if you had problems after installing snv_74 and then bfuing 
> to something based on 66.

I suspected that might be the case.

> In the meantime, use screen[1].

I do use screen.  Without virtual console support installed is it possible 
to switch back and forth from X to the master text console?  If so, how? 
If I can do that, I can live without virtual consoles.

> Preferred by whom?

That's partially what I'm asking.  I'm very new to Solaris and when 
Googling for "keeping Solaris up to date" I got alot of hits pointing to 
bfu.  Also, vconsole support, which I would like to be able to use, is 
only provided as bfu archives.

> The Sun-supported way to upgrade among Solaris *releases* (which SXCE 
> and SXDE are not) is to use the Upgrade feature, including LiveUpgrade.

I'll definitely check out those options.

> On a "real" system, one would never use BFU.

Sounds good to me.  I'm definitely open to other options.

> The mere existence of multiple distributions is not harmful to you; you 
> need only use one of them.

Agreed.

> At the present time, all architectural requirements are being enforced 
> at the OpenSolaris level, not the distribution level, so it will remain 
> possible for all distribution vendors to produce compatible products if 
> they wish (note that these requirements[2] are much stronger than 
> comparable efforts in the GNU/Linux communities such as LSB).  Again, 
> however, no one can force them to do so.

Which is exactly why I consider having so many distributions to choose 
from as both a strength and weakness for Linux.  It's encouraging to hear 
that the OpenSolaris community is working harder than the Linux community 
to promote compatibility across distributions.

> If you need a consistent and reliable distribution experience, stick 
> with Solaris. I'm hopeful that Sun will continue to ship and support it 
> in something like its current form for many years.

I can live with that.  So, if I want to stick with Solaris, which version 
should I be trying right now?  I gather from the above that what I'm 
running right now is not true Solaris.



Kevin
http://www.RawFedDogs.net
http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org
Bruceville, TX

Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla!!!

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-help mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to