On January 9, 2018 9:46 AM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Randall S. Becker <rsbec...@nexbridge.com> > On 01/09/2018 08:32 AM, Randall S. Becker wrote: > > On January 9, 2018 8:41 AM, Rich Salz > >> ➢ We are currently modifying the source from Apache to OpenSSL open > >> source > >> licensing for the Speck/OpenSSL integration. Related repositories such > >> as the cipher itself will remain under the Apache license. We would > >> love > >> input on the following items: > >> > >> Don’t bother changing the license. The future direction of OpenSSL > >> is moving to Apache, anda it’s unlikely this work would show up in > >> OpenSSL before we change the license. > >> > >> We’ll soon have a blog post about our current thoughts on a crypto policy. > >> Watch this space. > >> > >> For discussion, the future-compatible thing to do :) is open a GitHub > >> issue. > >> Then, make a pull request after the issue discussion seems to have > >> died down. > > A request, maybe OT. The NonStop platform does broadly deploy Apache > but do use OpenSSL. I understand that OpenSSL does not officially support > the HPE NonStop NSE/NSX platforms - but it is used on the platform through > my team's port, which I currently support, and through other ports as well. > Added a dependency to Apache is likely to dead-end the project for us > depending on the depth of the dependency, if I understand where this is > going (hoping I am wrong). > > > > Apache license, not Apache software.
Thank you thank you thank you 😊, but sorry about adding noise to the conversation. Cheers, Randall -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev