In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> rse> I've initially imported SSLeay 0.8.1b, SSLeay 0.9.0b and then
> rse> SSLeay 0.9.1b to the vendor branch before we hacked on OpenSSL
> rse> 0.9.1c. Did I made a mistake here?
> No, my mistake, but still, when I imported 0.9.0b in my repository,
> some things got automagically moved to the Attic. I wonder if that
> was a side effect of merging in some conflict corrections when I did
> the imports. I'll try to be more observant next time...
I think it was a side-effect. I've again poked around in CVS' manual page and
still cannot find an option which lets CVS move obsolete files to Attic on
imports. So, seems we haven't done a mistake. Instead we have to remove the
obsolete files ourself manually.
>[...]
> BTW, I wanna ask again: are patches for better functioning on VMS
> interesting to you, or shall I keep on distributing on my own? My
> work is pretty soon at openssl 0.9.1c...
I've personally no objection to incorporate your VMS patches. The problem is
just that we cannot support it, because AFAIK no one of the OpenSSL core team
members has access to VMS ;-). But that shouldn't mean your stuff cannot be
included. But it should perhaps at least stay in a separate directory and the
makevms.com should be there, too. Nevertheless you should at least post your
changes to this list, so we can make a better decision.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
