Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >[...]
> > BTW, I wanna ask again: are patches for better functioning on VMS
> > interesting to you, or shall I keep on distributing on my own? My
> > work is pretty soon at openssl 0.9.1c...
>
> I've personally no objection to incorporate your VMS patches. The problem is
> just that we cannot support it, because AFAIK no one of the OpenSSL core team
> members has access to VMS ;-). But that shouldn't mean your stuff cannot be
> included. But it should perhaps at least stay in a separate directory and the
> makevms.com should be there, too. Nevertheless you should at least post your
> changes to this list, so we can make a better decision.
I don't see why we shouldn't incorporate platform support even though we
can't support it - we do the same in Apache. The number of platforms we
can directly support is fairly small, so it would seem foolish to limit
it in this way!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
