On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> There's another variant that was proposed here, but hasn't yet
> been implemented, and it's that the section wouldn't just be a
> number. Instead, something like 1ssl, 3ssl, 5ssl and 7ssl would
> be used. The result is that you'd get a threads(3ssl), err(3ssl),
> passwd(1ssl), rc4(3ssl).
Why not openssl_passwd, openssl_err, etc?
-d
--
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.mindrot.org/
| Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) -or- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
